Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), who is in the midst of a competitive U.S.
Senate race against Republican election denier Kari Lake, appears to have violated federal financial disclosure law by reporting two transactions nearly two and five years late. Gallego on Tuesday disclosed an August 2019 purchase of non-publicly traded stock in investment advisory, Aspiration Fund Adviser LLC, valued between $15,001 and $50,000. Gallego also purchased corporate securities in pronunciation guide services company NameCoach Inc.
in June 2022. This investment is also valued between $15,001 and $50,000. Members of Congress are required to publicly report most purchases, sales and exchanges of stocks, bonds, commodity futures, securities and cryptocurrencies within 45 days of a transaction, as required by the 2012 law known as the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act.
"Rep. Gallego believes elected officials should be transparent and accountable to the people they represent, which is why he has co-sponsored legislation to clean up Washington and implement stricter disclosure requirements," said a spokesperson for Gallego, who declined to be named. "These investments were disclosed in previous filings and the recently filed report corrects inadvertent errors.
" ALSO READ: Donald Trump deep in debt while foreign money keeps coming: disclosure A Raw Story review of congressional financial records shows that the NameCoach transaction was disclosed on Gallego's 2022 annual report and on an amended version of the report filed Tuesday. The Aspiration Fund Adviser purchase was not disclosed on Gallego's 2019 annual report until Tuesday. Still, for such transactions, members of Congress also need to file a "periodic transaction report" — the formal name of a congressional financial disclosure for assets the STOCK Act mandates must be reported within 45 days of a transaction.
Gallego did not appear to file any periodic transaction reports for either purchase. Gallego co-sponsored the Ban Conflicted Trading Act and TRUST in Congress Act — both related to banning congressional stock trading. He also co-sponsored an anti-corruption reform bill, the For The People Act .
Gallego was first elected to Congress is 2014 and is now running for the U.S. Senate seat that will be vacated in January by Sen.
Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ). ALSO READ: Sen. John Fetterman violates financial law with botched corporate bond disclosures His opponent, Lake, gained notoriety for her false claims of election fraud in the 2020 and 2022 elections .
Lake lost her bid for Arizona governor to Democrat Katie Hobbs by less than one percentage point. At present, Gallego is just shy of a 6 percent polling lead over Lake, according to The Hill . Lake’s campaign did not immediately respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.
Another violator Another member of Congress, Rep. Tom Kean, Jr. (R-NJ), appeared to be more than nine months late disclosing the September 2023 sale of an asset in New Jersey bank, Regal Bancorp, valued between $1,001 and $15,000, according to a new congressional financial filing .
A note on Kean Jr.’s Aug. 13 report said, “Former publicly traded company; filer took no action to initiate this trade; result of a corporate action.
" Dan Scharfenberger, Kean Jr.'s chief of staff, emphasized to Raw Story that the line item is a "corporate transaction, not a stock transaction." "The asset itself was disposed of through a corporate merger that Congressman Kean did not have any input or decision-making control over.
As the compliance team has been preparing the congressman's annual personal financial disclosure report, they felt it would be best to over-report and file paperwork with the Ethics Committee on this matter," Scharfenberger said. "Congressman Kean continues to go above and beyond every legal standard to ensure full transparency." The Senate and House Ethics committees have historically advised members of Congress to disclose investment transactions as the result of corporate decisions such as mergers and acquisitions, but there's often confusion on the exact requirements.
Kean Jr. previously violated the STOCK Act when he was as much as four months late disclosing six personal stock transactions, valued up to $90,000 total. Rep.
Tom Kean Jr. (R-NJ) appeared to violate the STOCK Act again with a disclosure filed more than nine months late. (Photo by Jeff Fusco/Getty Images) At the time, Kean Jr.
told Raw Story via a September 2023 statement: “Upon taking office, I hired professionals to make certain that any and all transactions that I have control or interest in are reported accurately and quickly. However, this week, the attorney charged with overseeing my personal transaction reporting for the House shared with me that transactions from a family trust account, which I have no control over, were shared with him in an untimely fashion despite regular check-ins and confirmation of accurate reporting.” Kean Jr.
previously blasted STOCK Act violations from his 2022 opponent, Rep. Tom Malinowski, who he beat for his seat representing New Jersey’s 7th congressional district. Malinowski, a Democrat, failed to properly disclose between $671,000 and $2.
76 million in trades in 2020, with more than two dozen stock transactions taking place during the first several weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. One stock sale in March 2020 involved shares of a medical-diagnostic company that made COVID-19 tests, Business Insider reported . Kean Jr.
supports a ban on members of Congress trading individual stocks, Scharfenberger said. "He is leading by example as elected officials should always follow this model of transparency," Scharfenberger said. "Congressman Kean is also eager to move all of his stock and fund assets into a Qualified Blind Trust, and is working to diligently do so in consultation with the House Ethics Committee.
"Kean Jr. is running against Democrat Sue Altman this November. Epidemic of violations Four other members of Congress appeared to violate the STOCK Act in the past week, Raw Story reported .
Sens. John Fetterman (D-PA) and Bill Hagerty (R-TN), along with Reps. Stephanie Bice (R-OK) and Sean Casten (D-IL), all filed late disclosures.
Gallego joins Kean, Fetterman, Bice, Hagerty and Casten on a list of more than 50 members of the 118th Congress who Raw Story found to have violated the STOCK Act, mostly with late financial disclosures. Other lawmakers have reported stock trades that potentially conflict with their official responsibilities, such as lawmakers who trade defense contractor stock while sitting on a congressional committee with defense oversight responsibilities. Numerous bills have been introduced in recent years to effectively ban stock trading for members of Congress or increase the penalties for violations.
None have yet gotten a floor vote, and during the past three years, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has been one of the biggest obstacles to previous stock ban bills advancing. The latest progress toward a congressional stock trading ban came last month when the Ending Trading and Holdings in Congressional Stocks (ETHICS) Act advanced out of a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs markup with an eight to four vote, with Republican senators divided on how to proceed . The ETHICS Act proposes an immediate ban on members of Congress buying stocks and would prohibit them from selling stocks 90 days after enactment.
Members’ spouses and dependent children would be prohibited from trading stocks starting in March 2027, which is when the president and vice president would also be required to divest from covered investments such as securities, commodities, futures, options and trusts. Many Democratic strategists have been warning Vice President Kamala Harris that attacks from GOP rival Donald Trump and his allies will only grow worse between now and the presidential election in November. But as of mid-August, Harris is performing well in a long list of national and battleground state polls.
Although Trump is ahead of Harris by 1 percent in a Fox News poll released on August 14, the vice president has small single-digit leads in many others. Trump has been angrily railing against Harris on the campaign trail. But in an op-ed published by The Guardian on August 14, author and former Bill Clinton/Hillary Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal argues that so far, Trump's attacks are failing to resonate.
READ MORE: Undercover video details Project 2025's secretive 'second phase' — and exposes Trump’s connection "Trump has become delirious at the sight of Kamala Harris ," Blumenthal writes . "(King George's) courtiers succeeded in restraining him, while Trump's cannot control him. He rages, curses and shouts to the heavens of the unfairness of fate.
His aides attempt to calm and steady him about Joe Biden's withdrawal from the race." According to Blumenthal , Trump has been undisciplined and unfocused as a candidate. "Trump frantically attempts to find the key to a negative campaign against Harris," the former Clintons adviser observes .
"He stumblingly flickers his projection of Biden. She's the crook, the cheat, the liar. She's not really Black, or she is Black but only lately.
He mispronounces her name in a variety of deliberately mangled ways to make her seem strange, but in doing so, he appears stranger." Blumental adds , "She's 'dumb,' 'incompetent' and a 'bitch.' He states that Biden is plotting to stage a coup at the Democratic (National) Convention to overthrow her.
...
Trump’s projection has become blowback. He can't run a negative campaign to belittle Harris because his negative campaign engulfs and defines himself." READ MORE: Harris now leads among group of voters that have reliably voted GOP in the last 6 elections Sidney Blumenthal's full op-ed for The Guardian is available at this link .
Donald Trump sparked an outcry from military veterans and many others by proclaiming that the civilian Presidential Medal of Freedom as "better" than the Medal of Honor for military valor. The Republican presidential nominee praised Miriam Adelson, the widow of the late GOP megadonor Sheldon Adelson, during a speech Thursday evening at his New Jersey golf resort, where he recalled awarding her the civilian honor after the couple had poured millions of dollars into his first campaign. “I watched Sheldon sitting so proud in the White House when we gave Miriam the Presidential Medal of Freedom," Trump said.
"That’s the highest award you can get as a civilian, it’s the equivalent of the Congressional Medal of Honor." ALSO READ: Harris has figured out Trump’s greatest liability The Medal of Honor is the highest military honor bestowed for valor in combat, and it's often mistakenly called, as Trump did, the Congressional Medal of Honor. "But civilian version, it’s actually much better because everyone [who] gets the Congressional Medal of Honor, they're soldiers," Trump continued.
"They’re either in very bad shape because they’ve been hit so many times by bullets or they’re dead. She gets it, and she’s a healthy, beautiful woman, and they’re rated equal, but she got the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and she got it for — and that’s through committees and everything else.” Trump had been feuding with Adelson, who introduced him at this speech, up into this week, when he reportedly ordered one of his aides to bombard the eighth-richest woman in the world with abusive texts accusing her of hiring insufficiently loyal Republicans at the super PAC she funds, but he met privately with her before the event.
The Republican presidential nominee has previously slurred service members killed in combat as "suckers" and "losers," according to reports , and questioned what anyone got out of serving their country in the military, and many observers found his remarks about the Medal of Honor just as offensive. "General Kelly and Jeffrey Goldberg reported of Trump’s contempt for American heroes who sacrificed in war," said MSNBC's Joe Scarborough. "Here he denigrates their sacrifice again, saying civilian medals are better that war honors because its recipients aren’t 'hit so many times by bullets or dead.
'" "This submoronic s---heel gave the Medal of Freedom to Rush Limbaugh and Devin Nunes," added TV producer David Simon. "And because he's utterly ignorant, ahistorical and terrified to read anything longer than his own tweets, it's certain that he hasn't bothered to read the combat accounts of recipients of the Medal of Honor. To him, soldiers and sailors and Marines are 'suckers' and never asked the question on his mind: 'What was in it for them?' Those are his quotes.
This is his mind. This man is unfit to be an American citizen, let alone govern." "Trump [dishonors] Medal of Honor recipients, our nations highest military award for distinguished acts of valor," said Alexander Vindman, a former Army lieutenant colonel who testified in the first impeachment inquiry.
"He deserves nothing but disdain and disqualifies himself from public office." "Did not have 'denigrate Medal of Honor recipients' on my Trump’s Terrible Week bingo card, but here we are," said USA Today columnist Rex Huppke. "My god, this is beyond disrespectful.
" "Trump just said the medal he gave to a rich donor is 'better' than the Medal of Honor," said Marine Corps veteran Amy McGrath, who ran for U.S. Senate in Kentucky.
"This man really doesn’t have a clue." One Trump supporter and Marine Corps veteran, Josiah Lippincott, tried to clean up the former president's remarks. "As a Marine, I can say that Trump is exactly right about the Medal of Honor," Lippincott said .
"Getting that award means that either you or your friends and comrades came back in body bags or f----- up for life. No one should want that award." Dario DiBattista chimed in: "Part of my first day as a combat replacement in Iraq, was the memorial ceremony for Cpl Jason Dunham.
He leaped on a grenade to absorb its blast and save his fellow Marines. He made the Ultimate Sacrifice. Not even close to the same award Rush Limbaugh got.
F all the way off." Watch the comments below or click here. At Cambridge University Library , along with all the books, maps and manuscripts, there’s a child’s drawing that curators have titled “ The Battle of the Fruit and Vegetable Soldiers .
” The drawing depicts a turbaned cavalry soldier facing off against an English dragoon . It’s a bit trippy: The British soldier sits astride a carrot, and the turbaned soldier rides a grape. Both carrot and grape are fitted with horses’ heads and stick appendages.
‘The Battle of the Fruit and Vegetable Soldiers,’ a drawing on the back of a manuscript page from Charles Darwin’s ‘On the Origin of Species,’ attributed to Darwin’s young son Francis. Cambridge University Library , CC BY-ND It’s thought to be the work of Francis Darwin, the seventh child of British naturalist Charles Darwin and his wife, Emma, and appears to have been made in 1857, when Frank would have been 10 or 11. And it’s drawn on the back of a page of a draft of “ On the Origin of Species ,” Darwin’s masterwork and the foundational text of evolutionary biology.
The few sheets of the draft that survive are pages Darwin gave to his children to use for drawing paper. Darwin’s biographers have long recognized that play was important in his personal and familial life . The Georgian manor in which he and Emma raised their 10 children was furnished with a rope swing hung over the first-floor landing and a portable wooden slide that could be laid over the main stairway.
The gardens and surrounding countryside served as an open-air laboratory and playground. Play also has a role in Darwin’s theory of natural selection. As I explain in my new book, “ Kingdom of Play : What Ball-bouncing Octopuses, Belly-flopping Monkeys, and Mud-sliding Elephants Reveal about Life Itself,” there are many similarities – so many that if you could distill the processes of natural selection into a single behavior, that behavior would be play.
No goal, no direction Natural selection is the process by which organisms that are best adapted to their environments are more likely to survive, and so able to pass on the characteristics that helped them thrive to their offspring. It is undirected: In Darwin’s words, it “ includes no necessary and universal law of advancement or development .” Through natural selection, the rock pocket mouse has evolved a coat color that hides it from predators in the desert Southwest.
In contrast to foraging and hunting – behaviors with clearly defined goals – play is likewise undirected. When a pony frolics in a field, a dog wrestles with a stick or chimpanzees chase each other, they act with no goal in mind. Natural selection is utterly provisional: The evolution of any organism responds to whatever conditions are present at a given place and time.
Likewise, animals at play are acting provisionally. They constantly adjust their movements in response to changes in circumstances. Playing squirrels, faced with obstacles such as falling branches or other squirrels, nimbly alter their tactics and routes.
Natural selection is open-ended. The forms of life are not fixed, but continually evolving. Play, too, is open-ended.
Animals begin a play session with no plan of when to end it. Two dogs play-fighting, for instance, cease playing only when one is injured, exhausted or simply loses interest. Natural selection also is wasteful, as Darwin acknowledged.
“ Many more individuals of each species are born than can possibly survive ,” he wrote. But in the long term, he allowed, such profligacy could produce adaptations that enable an evolutionary line to become “more fit.” Keepers noticed that Shanthi, a 36-year-old elephant at the Smithsonian national zoo, liked to make noise with objects, so they gave her horns, harmonicas and other noisemakers.
Play is likewise profligate. It requires an animal to expend time and energy that perhaps would be better devoted to behaviors such as foraging and hunting that could aid survival. And that profligacy is also advantageous.
Animals forage and hunt in specific ways that don’t typically change. But an animal at play is far more likely to innovate – and some of its innovations may in time be adapted into new ways to forage and hunt. Competing and cooperating As Darwin first framed it, the “struggle for existence” was by and large a competition.
But in the 1860s, Russian naturalist Pyotr Kropotkin’s observations of birds and fallow deer led him to conclude that many species were “ the most numerous and the most prosperous ” because natural selection also selects for cooperation. Scientists confirmed Kroptokin’s hypothesis in the 20th century, discovering all manner of cooperation, not only between members of the same species but between members of different species. For example, clown fish are immune to anemone stings; they nestle in anemone tentacles for protection and, in return, keep the anemones free of parasites, provide nutrients and drive away predators .
Play likewise utilizes both competition and cooperation. Two dogs play-fighting are certainly competing, yet to sustain their play, they must cooperate. They often reverse roles: A dog with the advantage of position might suddenly surrender that advantage and roll over on its back.
If one bites harder than intended, it is likely to retreat and perform a play bow – saying, in effect, “My bad. I hope we can keep playing.” River otters at the Oregon Zoo repeatedly separate and reunite while playing in a tub of ice.
Natural selection and play also may both employ deception. From butterflies colored to resemble toxic species to wild cats that squeal like distressed baby monkeys , many organisms use mimicry to deceive their prey, predators and rivals. Play – specifically, play-fighting – similarly offers animals opportunities to learn about and practice deception.
To live is to play Darwin wrote that natural selection creates “ endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful .” Play also creates beauty in countless ways, from the aerial acrobatics of birds of prey to the arcing, twisting leaps of dolphins. In 1973, Ukrainian-American geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky published an essay with the take-no-prisoners title “ Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution .
” Many biologists would agree. Perhaps the most satisfying definition of life attends not to what it is but to what it does – which is to say, life is what evolves by natural selection. And since natural selection shares so many features with play, we may with some justification maintain that life, in a most fundamental sense, is playful.
David Toomey , Professor of English, UMass Amherst This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article ..
