By: Isuru Parakrama November 18, World (LNW): In what should have been a groundbreaking moment in human history, whistleblowers testified before a United States Congress sub-committee regarding the existence of “ non-human biologics ” associated with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAPs)—a politically accurate rebranding of the term UFOs. The testimonies suggested decades of secrecy surrounding extraterrestrial encounters, yet the public reaction was strikingly indifferent. Why did this mass revelation fail to ignite curiosity or debate, a sharp contrast to the feverish enthusiasm for extraterrestrial life that defined prior decades? Why did the public’s priorities evolve into a muted response to what was once considered the ultimate mystery.
The congressional hearing presented testimony from former intelligence officials, including David Grusch, who alleged that UAPs of non-human origin had been recovered and studied in secrecy. Whilst the claims were sensational, the evidence provided was frustratingly thin—offering little beyond anecdotal accounts and classified reports. The public’s apathy may partly stem from a lack of concrete proof.
Without physical artefacts, detailed footage, or scientific analysis, even the most credible whistleblowers struggle to convince a populace inundated with digital manipulation and conspiracy theories. Unlike the iconic Roswell incident or the grainy UFO photos of the 20th century, these claims lacked a tangible, visceral hook..
