Justin Timberlake recently found himself in hot water after a run-in with the law, but the pop star seems to have avoided major legal repercussions. But what about preferential treatment for celebrities? RadarOnline reported that Timberlake was able to leverage his celebrity status to secure a lenient plea deal in a New York courtroom, avoiding harsher penalties after being initially charged with DWI. And the biggest question here: is this how justice is administered for A-listers? The ‘Sexy Back’ singer managed to convince both prosecutors and the presiding judge to accept a plea deal, reducing his charge to driving while ability impaired.
ALSO READ| Hamptons DA affirms Justin Timberlake's DWI case to be treated as ‘every other case’ following his plea deal Hamptons DA said Timberlake's case is like ‘every other case’. Is it actually? Timberlake’s original charge of driving while intoxicated could have led to a much more serious legal outcome. Instead, this lighter charge is raising eyebrows, with many claiming it’s another instance of celebrities receiving favourable treatment, particularly in areas like the Hamptons.
“Stars are among the biggest draws out there. The last thing local officials need is for them to go away because they're being targeted by cops. It's bad for business,” a source told RadarOnline.
New York defence attorney Peter Gleason also weighed in, saying, “The ugly truth is that celebrity does play a role in criminal proceedings. If .
