Share this Story : Controversial new Canadian Army logo approved at highest levels, documents show Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Breadcrumb Trail Links News National Defence Watch Controversial new Canadian Army logo approved at highest levels, documents show Social-media ridicule prompted National Defence to issue an apology for the confusion and a statement clarifying that the Army’s official emblem wasn’t being replaced. Get the latest from David Pugliese, Ottawa Citizen straight to your inbox Sign Up Author of the article: David Pugliese • Ottawa Citizen Published Aug 20, 2024 • Last updated 6 minutes ago • 3 minute read Join the conversation You can save this article by registering for free here . Or sign-in if you have an account.
National Defence said the Canadian Army released on May 3 was developed by the department’s internal graphic design team at no extra expense to taxpayers. Photo by Canadian Army / X (Twitter) Article content A new Canadian Army logo that sparked an intense online backlash was approved at the highest level with no objections raised about the image that has since been likened to a bear having sex with a moose. The senior level military approval process for the new Canadian Army logo started in March 2024 with a plan to roll out the image in May online, according to documents obtained by the Ottawa Citizen.
Advertisement 2 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles from Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, Andrew Duffy, Bruce Deachman and others.
Plus, food reviews and event listings in the weekly newsletter, Ottawa, Out of Office. Unlimited online access to Ottawa Citizen and 15 news sites with one account. Ottawa Citizen ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Exclusive articles from Elizabeth Payne, David Pugliese, Andrew Duffy, Bruce Deachman and others. Plus, food reviews and event listings in the weekly newsletter, Ottawa, Out of Office. Unlimited online access to Ottawa Citizen and 15 news sites with one account.
Ottawa Citizen ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. Sign In or Create an Account Email Address Continue or View more offers If you are a Home delivery print subscriber, unlimited online access is included in your subscription.
Activate your Online Access Now Article content But, once made public, the logo — a tilted maple leaf and a pixilated camouflage pattern — met with immediate ridicule. Some social-media users expressed anger, claiming the army was changing its official emblem. Others compared the new logo to an image of a man or bear having sex with a moose.
Memes were created making fun of the new Army icon, which others likened to a pile of feces or pixel art from Minecraft, an online game. The social-media ridicule prompted National Defence to issue an apology for the confusion and a statement clarifying that the Army’s official emblem wasn’t being replaced. Instead, it noted, the icon was a supplementary design.
But Army documents obtained using the Access to Information law show the new logo was carefully planned and approved by military leadership. The approval process started on March 21 with the deputy army commander, followed by discussion among army public affairs officers at a townhall and then a briefing April 12 for top army leaders, the records showed. No objections to the new imagery were registered at the time.
But the rollout documents pointed out that the image could only be used a certain way. “Icon should not be flipped horizontally or vertically,” the briefing documents noted, although there was no explanation for that instruction. Advertisement 3 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content The image is supposed to highlight the colours used in the Army’s new camouflage pattern. In particular, the icon resembles the pixels, in shades of brown, topped by a maple leaf and was extracted from this pattern, according to National Defence. The social-media backlash was immediate after the Army posted its new icon May 3.
Besides the sexual references, much of the commentary focused on trying to figure out what the imagery was supposed to represent. “Looks like something I wipe off my windshield while pumping gas,” one commentator wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter. Questions were also raised about who came up with the logo and who approved it, with suggestions that those individuals be fired.
Conservative MPs claimed that the Liberal government had forced the new imagery on the Army. The documents, however, make clear that the icon was an Army initiative developed by in-house personnel. National Defence spokesman Alex Tétreault says the new logo is in use.
“The icon design will be displayed in the bottom left corner of various internal and external products and presentations,” he stated in an email to the Ottawa Citizen. “It will also be used in video animation and content generated for social media.” Advertisement 4 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content The icon was part of a new Army branding and communications strategy. That strategy had a goal to “establish and maintain credibility,” noted then-Army commander Lt. Gen.
Jocelyn Paul in the service’s new public affairs strategy released in May. Paul has since retired. Tétreault said the army did not produce a follow-up report to examine what went right or wrong with the rollout of the logo or to examine what was behind the resulting social-media backlash.
But a retired senior military public affairs officer says that was the wrong approach to take. “Not conducting lessons-learned on initiatives such as this to understand the positive and negative is an abdication of professional responsibility and a failure of senior leader oversight of the communications function,” retired army Col. Brett Boudreau said.
“Going forward, it essentially guarantees a repeat of bad process, decisions, planning and outcomes in similar undertakings.” He said the new icon initiative, “while surely well-meaning, was a failure.” Tétreault noted the imagery was developed by the department’s internal graphic design team at no extra expense to taxpayers.
David Pugliese is an award-winning journalist covering Canadian Forces and military issues in Canada. To support his work, subscribe: ottawacitizen.com/subscribe Recommended from Editorial Ottawa examined as permanent base for new refuelling planes, but ultimately rejected: RCAF documents Canadian military drones will face challenges operating in Arctic, RCAF report warns Article content Share this article in your social network Share this Story : Controversial new Canadian Army logo approved at highest levels, documents show Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Comments You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Create an Account Sign in Join the Conversation Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site.
You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information. Trending Capital Pride controversy: Who’s marching and who’s not Transient population coming into Centretown from the ByWard Market: councillor Ottawa OPP respond to a number of calls about people walking, biking on Highway 417 OCDSB announces it will not march in Pride parade, but that may be overturned FOR LOVE AND MONEY: Miles has Redblacks 'D' clicking while daughter battles life-threatening illness Read Next Latest National Stories Featured Local Savings.
