THE political situation nearly a month after the uprising in Bangladesh has generated a ferment of ideas about what to do next from a diverse range of social forces. It has also led to demands being made on the interim government by all and sundry. All this is to be expected and reflects what has happened in other parts of the world where people’s upsurges have taken place.

Let’s review the forces at work. First, there’s an influential body of people who argue the problem of democracy in Bangladesh stems from an original sin in the constitution. The enactment of the constitution in 1972, written in English and then translated into Bengali, was ratified by a parliament whose members were elected in Pakistan.

The whole process they feel did not embody the spirit of the independence struggle of 1971 and simply bore the imprint of a single party. The entire nation was not involved in that process. Now, as a matter of urgency, they are arguing for a conference and convention to discuss, debate, and formulate a new constitution.

They emphasise its necessity because they feel that the present movement is akin to a second “independence struggle.” Second, there are prominent economists and thinkers who strongly feel that any talk of constitution, legitimacy and even legality is a distraction and a luxury. What the interim government should as a matter of urgency concentrate on is the vulnerable nature of the economy.

The head of a prominent think tank has been asked to lead .