Harare – A controversial plan by President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s allies to extend his time in office is facing significant headwinds, not least the staggering financial implications. The proposal, which would require amending the constitution and holding potentially two referendums, carries a projected cost running into billions of US dollars, raising serious questions about its feasibility and political wisdom. The current constitution, adopted after referendums in 2000 and 2013, limits presidential terms to two five-year periods.
Despite President Mnangagwa previously stating his intention to step down in 2028, a resolution passed at Zanu-PF’s annual conference in Bulawayo last month seeks to extend his tenure beyond this date. Legal experts have outlined the complex and costly process involved. They anticipate the need for two separate referendums: one to postpone the next general election beyond 2028 and another to specifically allow Mnangagwa to benefit as the incumbent president.
While both referendums and general elections involve similar processes, the legal experts highlight that the referendum process is even more expensive due to the intricate legislative changes required. The financial implications are staggering. The Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) received ZW$860 billion (approximately US$188 million at the time) to conduct the disputed August 2023 general elections.
However, constitutional lawyer Lovemore Madhulu believes a referendum would be far cost.