Record-breaking heat waves scorching cities, landslides and floods sweeping away whole towns — the world is currently in the grip of a climate emergency. More than 2,300 local governments in more than 40 countries around the world have declared it. At this time, when climate change is affecting the earth in unprecedented ways, climate scientists around the world are working hard to keep track of the damage.
The question is: should they continue to make observations and analyse data impartially, as scientists usually do? Or should they raise their voices and engage in advocacy and activism to push for mitigation? Raghu Murtugudde, a professor of climate studies at IIT Bombay, cautioned that excessive communication and activism around climate science can be a distraction to scientists, and they should still do what they are paid to do: the science. “My worry is that a little climate knowledge tends to lead to a massive saviour complex,” he said. Karthik Ganesan, a researcher who works in policy research at the intersection of energy consumption and environmental impacts at the Council of Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW), has a different view.
Doing science alone may not be enough for scientists, he believes, especially if they are going head-to-head against entrenched interests in any specific area. “So a stakeholder with a commercial interest in technologies and processes that are currently in use has significant incentive to keep the status quo,” he said. “How.