The Supreme Court in a recent order refused to quash the Bombay High Court's verdict which struck down the Amendment made by the Maharashtra government in the Right to Education (RTE) Act 2009. Through this amendment the Maharashtra government exempted private schools from providing the 25% quota for admissions to Class I or Pre-school for children of disadvantaged sections, if there was a government-run or aided school within 1 km radius of that private school. A bench of CJI DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra upheld the high court's decision and held that existence of a government school nearby does not mean that children belonging to the Economically Weaker Sections will not get an opportunity to attend good schools.

CJI Chandrachud while presiding over the hearing said that children belonging to the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) must get an opportunity to attend good schools. "Ultimately if we want to give children from EWS a real chance in life, they must be given education in good schools. Why would a parent want to send their child to a municipal school, when they have access to a good school?" CJI Chandrachud asked while hearing the arguments.

The Association of Indian Schools had challenged the high court order contending it would be incorrect to impose this obligation on private schools, as according to the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, it's the duty of the states to ensure that children from the marginalise.